Evidence-backed briefs. Half-written drafts.
Turn real AI-visibility gaps into a ranked content plan and generated drafts grounded in the pages competitors are cited for. AI content optimization built on evidence, not guesswork.
Run your free auditSound familiar?
- The content calendar is guesses.
- Briefs take longer than drafts.
- No proof any piece moved anything.
- “Write more comparison pages” with no evidence of which ones.
What you'd actually use it for
| Use case | What Cited does | Output you get |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence-backed content plan | Ranks every gap by impact on real buying conversations | A prioritized calendar you didn't have to research |
| Half-written drafts | Generates the asset grounded in the pages AI actually cites | A draft, not a blank doc |
| Ship it today | Exports to Markdown or PDF, ready for your CMS | Content shipped the day it was planned |
| Before/after tracking | Workspace holds the history and the diffs | Proof the piece moved your AI search visibility |
| FAQ synthesis | Builds FAQ content from evidence across your category | Answers grounded in what buyers actually ask |
How it plays out
A content marketer owes three pieces this month and has zero appetite for guessing which three. The ranked gap list hands them over: a migration guide, a comparison page, and an integrations FAQ, ordered by the buying conversations each one affects. She generates all three drafts, edits, exports, and publishes inside the week. On the next run, Workspace shows the migration guide is now cited by ChatGPT in the exact conversations it was built for. The calendar writes itself from evidence now, and the before/after is the proof her lead asks for.
What you walk away with
A plan, not a hunch
Ranked gaps become the content calendar, each tied to real buying conversations.
Drafts that start at 50%
Every gap generates a real draft grounded in the actual competitive evidence.
Published, not planned
Export to Markdown or PDF and ship the same day.
Proof it worked
Before/after tracking in Workspace shows which pieces moved your AI search visibility.
Starter fits content teams: 3 audits a month, 2 AI-drafted assets a month, Workspace history. See pricing →
Step by step
“You need three pieces this month that actually move the needle, backed by evidence, not guesses.”
| Step | Where in Cited | What you walk away with |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Open the ranked gap list | Understand | A prioritized content plan you didn't have to research |
| 2. Click a gap to see the actual competitor pages cited | Understand → evidence | The brief writes itself, real examples, not vibes |
| 3. Generate the draft | Act | A half-written asset grounded in the specific gap |
| 4. Edit, export, publish | Act → Share/Export (MD/PDF) | Content shipped, same day |
| 5. Track the before/after | Workspace (Starter/Pro) | Proof the piece moved your AI search visibility |
| 6. Export the Executive Brand Report | One click | A leadership-ready PPTX/PDF: your SOV, the gaps, the trend, ready to present. |
Turn brand visibility gaps into AI recommendations. Track. Iterate. Repeat.
Most tools monitor AI visibility. Cited is brand intelligence with an execution loop: measure, evidence, diagnose, fix, win and repeat.
| What you need | Cited | Monitoring-only tools |
|---|---|---|
| “What do I even do about it?” | The missing page, drafted and ready for your edit | You're on your own after the score |
| See where buyers shortlist you out | Every missed conversation, with the reason why | A score, refreshed on schedule |
| AI share of voice leadership can trust | Benchmarked trend, evidence behind every number | A number without the answers |
Your buyers already asked AI. Reach them before your competitors
Win category conversations with GEO optimized Brand Visibility