Cited for Growth & Demand Gen Teams
See which evidence gap costs the most buying conversations, get instant competitor intel mid-deal, and act on it as a team.
Run your free auditSound familiar?
- Pipeline is leaking before the funnel starts and nothing measures it.
- No way to rank which gap actually costs deals.
- Sales asks for competitor intel and gets a stale doc.
- Alerts arrive as anecdotes, not signals.
What you'd actually use it for
| Use case | What Cited does | Output you get |
|---|---|---|
| Gap prioritization | Ranks every gap by the buying conversations it affects | A number, not a hunch, for what to fix first |
| Mid-deal Competitive Snapshot | Run an on-demand check on any named company, in seconds | Intel the rep can use on the next call |
| Battle Card generation | Builds internal sales enablement from real cited evidence | A Battle Card grounded in receipts |
| Threat Alerts + Slack (Pro) | Cited watches your tracked competitors automatically and pings the channel | You find out first, not a month later |
| Action Center tracking | Every published fix is re-checked by every newer audit | Fixes tracked automatically, not lost in a thread |
How it plays out
A growth lead loses two deals to the same competitor in one quarter. A Competitive Snapshot confirms it: the competitor owns 5 of 8 buying prompts in the category. The ranked gap list shows a missing migration guide affecting more conversations than anything else, so it ships first. The fix is tracked to done in Action Center, and when the competitor moves next, the threat alert lands in Slack the same week, not in next quarter's win/loss review.
What you walk away with
Rank by revenue relevance
Gaps ranked by buying conversations affected, a concrete number, not an abstract score.
Intel at deal speed
Run a Competitive Snapshot on any named company, on demand, a real read in seconds.
A team that closes loops
Action Center ranks every gap by impact and tracks it to done.
Signals, not anecdotes
Automatic competitive checks with proactive Slack and email alerts on Pro.
Starter covers the loop; Pro adds continuous competitive intelligence and Slack. See pricing →
Step by step
“You need to tell your VP whether AI is quietly hurting your brand's visibility, with a number, not a hunch.”
| Step | Where in Cited | What you walk away with |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Run a real audit on your domain | Onboarding → Discover | Your AI share of voice: a real number, not a guess |
| 2. Read which evidence competitors have that you don't | Understand | The gap list, each with cited URLs and sample size |
| 3. Generate the highest-impact missing asset | Act | An editable draft, exportable for the deck |
| 4. Run it again next cycle | Discover (re-run) | SOV trend + whether AI's narrative about you shifted |
| 5. Forward the weekly number to your team | Weekly SOV Digest (Starter) | A recurring, reportable metric, no manual work |
| 6. Export the Executive Brand Report | One click | A VP-update-ready PPTX/PDF: your SOV, the gaps, the trend, ready to present. |
Turn brand visibility gaps into AI recommendations. Track. Iterate. Repeat.
Most tools monitor AI visibility. Cited is brand intelligence with an execution loop: measure, evidence, diagnose, fix, win and repeat.
| What you need | Cited | Monitoring-only tools |
|---|---|---|
| “Which gap actually costs us deals?” | Gaps ranked by the buying conversations they cost you | No prioritization |
| See where buyers shortlist you out | Every missed conversation, with the reason why | A score, refreshed on schedule |
| AI share of voice leadership can trust | Benchmarked trend, evidence behind every number | A number without the answers |
Your buyers already asked AI. Reach them before your competitors
Win category conversations with GEO optimized Brand Visibility