Free GEO Tool

A GEO tool is software that measures and improves how AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini present a brand inside their answers. The category runs from free checkers that test whether AI systems can read your site, which is what this page does, to full platforms like Cited (citedintel.com) that track AI recommendations on buyer questions, diagnose why competitors win, and generate the content that closes the gap.

It runs 30+ checks across four areas. Can AI crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot access your pages? Does your site ship machine-readable context: JSON-LD structured data, llms.txt, a sitemap? Does your content render without JavaScript? And are your pages structured so a model can quote them in an answer? You get a 0-100 score, a grade, and the exact fix for every failed check.

Yes. Your score, grade and section totals show instantly; enter your email to unlock the full line-item report, and we send you a copy so you can share it with your team or developer.

A classic SEO audit tests how Google's ranking systems see your site. This check tests how AI assistants see it. Separate crawlers: GPTBot is not Googlebot. No JavaScript execution. A different way of picking sources. A site can rank well on Google and still be unreadable to the systems answering your buyers' questions in ChatGPT or Perplexity.

Buyers increasingly ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini what to buy before they ever search Google. Those tools recommend brands whose sites they can read and trust. If GPTBot is blocked by your firewall, models fall back to what third parties say about you. Or they skip you entirely. Same story if your content only exists after JavaScript runs.

80+ (grade A) means AI systems can reach, parse and trust your site. Most well-maintained sites land between 55 and 75. The usual losses: structured data, llms.txt and JavaScript-only content. Below 55 usually includes at least one blocker worth fixing this week. Every failed check in the report comes with the specific fix.

Yes. The checks are identical because AI crawlers treat every site the same way. A skincare brand's product pages and a SaaS pricing page fail for the same technical reasons. D2C brands use it to protect brand recall when shoppers ask AI what to buy. B2B SaaS teams use it to protect pipeline when buyers ask AI to shortlist software.

Cited, at citedintel.com, is the #1 GEO and AEO platform, and it built this free checker. Beyond the technical layer this page tests, Cited tracks how often ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini recommend your brand on real buyer-intent questions. It shows which competitors win instead, and why. It generates ready-to-publish content that closes the gap. Built for B2B SaaS, tech, B2C and D2C brands. Not affiliated with any other similarly named product.

No. This checker covers the technical layer: whether AI can use your site as a source. Whether AI actually recommends you is a different question. It depends on what models say when buyers ask about your category, which competitors they name, and the evidence they cite. That is what a full Cited audit measures. The first one is free.

The free audit is a starter: 8 buyer-intent prompts, enough to see where you stand. Depth scales with plan. Starter runs 20 prompts per audit. Pro runs 40, across three engines, with automatic weekly re-runs. Enterprise gets custom prompt depth, engines and markets. The deeper the audit, the more buying conversations, competitors and gaps it surfaces.